Hm, Ryan, you may have inadvertently solved the problem. :)

Going flat out in a loop, indexing 1 doc at a time, I can only index
about 17,000 per minute - roughly what I was seeing with my app
running... which makes me suspicious. The number is too close to be
coincidental.

It could very well be that I may be getting many more than 17,000
updates per minute - and because I cant index them fast enough, the
event queue in the underlying library (that is providing me the events)
may be growing without bound... 

So, looks like I have to increase the throughput with the indexing.
(indexing 1 at a time is far from ideal - even with the buffering). I
may have to either implement some client-side buffering to make it more
efficient - or eliminate the http layer (go embedded).

Thanks.

-Nick


-----Original Message-----
From: Minutello, Nick 
Sent: 13 January 2010 23:29
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Interesting OutOfMemoryError on a 170M index


>> if you are using auto-commit, you should not call commit from the
client
Cheers, thanks.

>> Do you need the index to be updated this often?  
Wouldn't increasing the autocommit time make it worse? (ie more
documents buffered) I can extend it and see what effect it has....

-Nick

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan McKinley [mailto:ryan...@gmail.com]
Sent: 13 January 2010 23:16
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Interesting OutOfMemoryError on a 170M index


On Jan 13, 2010, at 5:34 PM, Minutello, Nick wrote:

> Agreed, commit every second.

Do you need the index to be updated this often?  Are you reading from it
every second?  and need results that are that "fresh"

If not, i imagine increasing the auto-commit time to 1min or even 10
secs would help some.

Re, calling commit from the client with auto-commit...  if you are using
auto-commit, you should not call commit from the client

ryan



>
> Assuming I understand what you're saying correctly:
> There shouldn't be any index readers - as at this point, just writing 
> to the index.
> Did I understand correctly what you meant?
>
> -Nick
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lance Norskog [mailto:goks...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 13 January 2010 22:28
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Interesting OutOfMemoryError on a 170M index
>
> The time in autocommit is in milliseconds. You are committing every 
> second while indexing.  This then causes a build-up of sucessive index

> readers that absorb each commit, which is probably the out-of- memory.
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Minutello, Nick 
> <nick.minute...@credit-suisse.com
> > wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a bit of an interesting OutOfMemoryError that I'm trying to 
>> figure out.
>>
>> My client & Solr server are running in the same JVM (for deployment 
>> simplicity). FWIW, I'm using Jetty to host Solr. I'm using the 
>> supplied code for the http-based client interface. Solr 1.3.0.
>>
>> My app is adding about 20,000 documents per minute to the index - one

>> at a time (it is listening to an event stream and for every event, it

>> adds a new document to the index).
>> The size of the documents, however, is tiny - the total index growth 
>> is only about 170M (after about 1 hr and the OutOfMemoryError) At 
>> this point, there is zero querying happening - just updates to the 
>> index (only adding documents, no updates or deletes) After about an 
>> hour or so, my JVM runs out of heap space - and if I look at the 
>> memory utilisation over time, it looks like a classic memory leak. It

>> slowly ramps up until we end up with constant FULL GC's and eventual 
>> OOME.
>> Max heap space is 512M.
>>
>> In Solr, I'm using autocommit (to buffer the updates)
>>        <autoCommit>
>>          <maxDocs>10000</maxDocs>
>>          <maxTime>1000</maxTime>
>>        </autoCommit>
>>
>> (Aside: Now, I'm not sure if I am meant to call commit or not on the 
>> client SolrServer class if I am using autocommit - but as it turns 
>> out, I get OOME whether I do that or not)
>>
>> Any suggestions/advice of quick things to check before I dust off the

>> profiler?
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Nick
>>
>> =
>> =====================================================================
>> =========
>>  Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic 
>> communications disclaimer:
>>  http://www.credit-suisse.com/legal/en/disclaimer_email_ib.html
>>
>> =
>> =====================================================================
>> =========
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Lance Norskog
> goks...@gmail.com
>
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> ======================================================================
> Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic 
> communications disclaimer:
> http://www.credit-suisse.com/legal/en/disclaimer_email_ib.html
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> ======================================================================
>


========================================================================
======= 
 Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic
communications disclaimer: 
 http://www.credit-suisse.com/legal/en/disclaimer_email_ib.html 
 
========================================================================
======= 
 

=============================================================================== 
 Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic 
communications disclaimer: 
 http://www.credit-suisse.com/legal/en/disclaimer_email_ib.html 
 
=============================================================================== 
 

Reply via email to