Shalin:
Can you point me to pages/resources that talk about this approach
in details ? OR can you provide more details on the schema and the
function(?) used for ranking the documents.
Thanks,
~Ravi.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:41 AM, Otis Gospodnetic <
> otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com
> > wrote:
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> >
> > > From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar <shalinman...@gmail.com>
> > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > > Sent: Wed, December 23, 2009 2:45:21 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Adaptive search?
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 4:09 AM, Lance Norskog wrote:
> > >
> > > > Nice!
> > > >
> > > > Siddhant: Another problem to watch out for is the feedback problem:
> > > > someone clicks on a link and it automatically becomes more
> > > > interesting, so someone else clicks, and it gets even more
> > > > interesting... So you need some kind of suppression. For example, as
> > > > individual clicks get older, you can push them down. Or you can put a
> > > > cap on the number of clicks used to rank the query.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > We use clicks/views instead of just clicks to avoid this problem.
> >
> > Doesn't a click imply a view? You click to view. I must be missing
> > something...
> >
> >
> I was talking about boosting documents using past popularity. So a user
> searches for X and gets 10 results. This view is recorded for each of the
> 10
> documents and added to the index later. If a user clicks on result #2, the
> click is recorded for doc #2 and added to index. We boost using
> clicks/view.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
>
