Thank you, Ryan. I will have a look on lucene's material and luke. I think I got it. :)
Sometimes there will be the need, to response on the one hand the value and on the other hand the indexed version of the value. How can I fullfill such needs? Doing copyfield on indexed-only fields? ryantxu wrote: > > > On Jan 7, 2010, at 10:50 AM, MitchK wrote: > >> >> Eric, >> >> you mean, everything is okay, but I do not see it? >> >>>> Internally for searching the analysis takes place and writes to the >>>> index in an inverted fashion, but the stored stuff is left alone. >> >> if I use an analyzer, Solr "stores" it's output two ways? >> One public output, which is similar to the original input >> and one "hidden" or internal output, which is based on the >> analyzer's work? >> Did I understand that right? > > yes. > > indexed fields and stored fields are different. > > Solr results show stored fields in the results (however facets are > based on indexed fields) > > Take a look at Lucene in Action for a better description of what is > happening. The best tool to get your head around what is happening is > probably luke (http://www.getopt.org/luke/) > > >> >> If yes, I have got another problem: >> I don't want to waste any diskspace. > > You have control over what is stored and what is indexed -- how that > is configured is up to you. > > ryan > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Custom-Analyzer-Tokenizer-works-but-results-were-not-saved-tp27026739p27063452.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
