A bigger batchSize results in increased memory usage. I guess performance should be slightly better with bigger values but not verified.
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 2:51 AM, Joel Nylund <jnyl...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi, > > it looks like from looking at the code the default is 500, is the > recommended setting for this? > > Has anyone notice any significant performance/memory tradeoffs by making > this much bigger? > > thanks > Joel > > -- ----------------------------------------------------- Noble Paul | Systems Architect| AOL | http://aol.com
