wojtekpia wrote: > > Could this be solved with a multi-valued custom field type (including a > custom comparator)? The OP's situation deals with multi-valuing products > for each customer. If products contain strictly numeric fields then it > seems like a custom field implementation (or extension of BinaryField?) > *should* be easy - only the comparator part needs work. I'm not clear on > how the existing query parsers would handle this though, so there's > probably some work there too. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1131 SOLR-1131 seems like a > more general solution that supports analysis that numeric fields don't > need. >
Thank you for your suggestion. It was my hope that I had simply not understood how to properly define the schema in Solr, or that I had not understood how to use the existing Solr functionality. I will further look into the suggestions that I have received so far, however I have concerns that my Solr project cannot proceed with the technology present. Lance may be correct in his assertion that I am using the incorrect tool for the job. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/question-about-schemas-tp26600956p26680485.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
