Thanks, that's great to know. -Matt --- On Wed, 10/21/09, Yonik Seeley <ysee...@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Yonik Seeley <ysee...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Near Real Time To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 6:57 PM On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Matthew Rushton <mrusht...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I'm investigating several search indexing options and solr looks great but > I have a few questions I couldn't find answers to. To begin I don't think the > near real time features of Lucene are a requirement to start but I do think > it will be a requirement moving forward and I was curious as to the plans to > incorporate NRT functionality in Solr. Is it on the road map? Any clue when > they will get put in? Yes NRT is definitely on the roadmap. Solr already converted to using per-segment searching and field-cache use (for sorting or function queries), so although it not "NRT", 1.4 is an improvement over 1.3 in some areas of NRT. > Further without the NRT features present what's the closest I can expect to > real time for the typical use case (obviously this will vary but the average > deploy). One hour? One Minute? It seems like there are a few hacks to get > somewhat close. Thanks so much. Depends a lot on the nature of the requests and the size of the index, but one minute is often doable. On a large index that facets on many fields per request, one minute is probably still out of reach. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com
