On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:30 AM, Aleksander Stensby
<aleksander.sten...@integrasco.com> wrote:
> So I'm wondering if the Trie based field types are less memory expensive
> than the "old" SortableXXFields?
> sorting on the date field (which is a TrieDateField) works fine (and
> fast)...

In general, yes (assuming there are many unique values - your ID field
would qualify).  SortableXXFields used the StringIndex (the only
option in the past)... Trie* fields FieldCache entry use long[maxDoc]
for TrieLong and TrieDate.

-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com

Reply via email to