Well you are talking about a very relational behavior, Tan. You can declare a "locations" and "location_*" field in your schema. While indexing a document, put all the locations inside the field "locations". Populate "location_state", "location_city" etc .. with their corresponding location values. That ways, when no filter is applied, you can facet on the "locations" field to get all the locations. In all other scenarios when a filter on field "foo" is applied, faceting on "location_foo" will give you the desired results.
Cheers Avlesh On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:16 PM, R. Tan <tanrihae...@gmail.com> wrote: > I can't because there are facet values for each location, such as > state/city/neighborhood and facilities. Example result is "7 Eleven", 100 > locations when no location filters are applied, where there is a filter for > state, it should show "7 Eleven, 20 locations. > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:57 PM, Aakash Dharmadhikari <aaka...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > can't you store the locations as part of the parent listing while > storing. > > This way there would be only one document per parent listing. And all the > > locations related information can be multi valued attributes per property > > or > > any other way depending on the attributes. > > > > 2009/9/3 R. Tan <tanrihae...@gmail.com> > > > > > Hi Solrers, > > > I would like to get your opinion on how to best approach a search > > > requirement that I have. The scenario is I have a set of business > > listings > > > that may be group into one parent business (such as 7-eleven having > > several > > > locations). On the results page, I only want 7-eleven to show up once > but > > > also show how many locations matched the query (facet filtered by > state, > > > for > > > example) and maybe a preview of the some of the locations. > > > > > > Searching for the business name is straightforward but the locations > > within > > > the a result is quite tricky. I can do the opposite, searching for the > > > locations and faceting on business names, but it will still basically > be > > > the > > > same thing and repeat results with the same business name. > > > > > > Any advice? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > R > > > > > >
