Thanks. I guess it will have to be the workaround then. On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar < shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Rihaed Tan <tanrihae...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have a similar requirement to Matthew (from his post 2 years ago). Is > > this > > still the way to go in storing both the ID and name/value for facet > values? > > I'm planning to use id#name format if this is still the case and doing a > > prefix query. I believe this is a common requirement so I'd appreciate if > > any of you guys can share what's the best way to do it. > > > > Also, I'm indexing the facet values for text search as well. Should the > > field declaration below suffice the requirement? > > > > <field name="category" type="text" indexed="true" stored="true" > > required="true" multiValued="true"/> > > > > There have been talks of having a pair field type in Solr but there is no > patch yet. So I guess the way proposed by Yonik is a good solution. > > -- > Regards, > Shalin Shekhar Mangar. >
