Thanks Uri. How does paging and scoring work when using field collapsing?
What patch works with 1.3? Is it production ready?

R


On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Uri Boness <ubon...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The development on this patch is quite active. It works well for single
> solr instance, but distributed search (ie. shards) is not yet supported.
> Using this page you can group search results based on a specific field.
> There are two flavors of field collapsing - adjacent and non-adjacent, the
> former collapses only document which happen to be located next to each other
> in the otherwise-non-collapsed results set. The later (the non-adjacent) one
> collapses all documents with the same field value (regardless of their
> position in the otherwise-non-collapsed results set). Note, that
> non-adjacent performs better than adjacent one. There's currently discussion
> to extend this support so in addition to collapsing the documents, extra
> information will be returned for the collapsed documents (see the discussion
> on the issue page).
>
> Uri
>
>
> R. Tan wrote:
>
>> I think this is what I'm looking for. What is the status of this patch?
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:00 PM, R. Tan <tanrihae...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hi Solrers,
>>> I would like to get your opinion on how to best approach a search
>>> requirement that I have. The scenario is I have a set of business
>>> listings
>>> that may be group into one parent business (such as 7-eleven having
>>> several
>>> locations). On the results page, I only want 7-eleven to show up once but
>>> also show how many locations matched the query (facet filtered by state,
>>> for
>>> example) and maybe a preview of the some of the locations.
>>>
>>> Searching for the business name is straightforward but the locations
>>> within
>>> the a result is quite tricky. I can do the opposite, searching for the
>>> locations and faceting on business names, but it will still basically be
>>> the
>>> same thing and repeat results with the same business name.
>>>
>>> Any advice?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> R
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to