Nobody knoes how can i get exactly this info : index format : -9 (UNKNOWN) Despite of knowing <str name="lucene-impl-version">2.9-dev 794238 - 2009-07-15 18:05:08</str> helps, i assume that it doesn't implies an index format change
Am i wrong? El 11 de agosto de 2009 11:53, Licinio Fernández Maurelo<licinio.fernan...@gmail.com> escribió: > Thanks all for your responses, > > what i expect to get is the index format version as it appears in > luke's overview tab (index format : -9 (UNKNOWN) > > 2009/7/31 Jay Hill <jayallenh...@gmail.com>: >> Check the system request handler: http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/system >> >> Should look something like this: >> <lst name="lucene"> >> <str name="solr-spec-version">1.3.0.2009.07.28.10.39.42</str> >> <str name="solr-impl-version">1.4-dev 797693M - jayhill - 2009-07-28 >> 10:39:42</str> >> <str name="lucene-spec-version">2.9-dev</str> >> <str name="lucene-impl-version">2.9-dev 794238 - 2009-07-15 18:05:08</str> >> </lst> >> >> -Jay >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Walter Underwood >> <wun...@wunderwood.org>wrote: >> >>> I think the properties page in the admin UI lists the Lucene version, but I >>> don't have a live server to check that on at this instant. >>> >>> wunder >>> >>> >>> On Jul 30, 2009, at 10:26 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote: >>> >>> >>>> : > i want to get the lucene index format version from solr web app (as >>>> >>>> : the Luke request handler writes it out: >>>> : >>>> : indexInfo.add("version", reader.getVersion()); >>>> >>>> that's the index version (as in "i have added docs to the index, so the >>>> version number has changed") the question is about the format version (as >>>> in: "i have upgraded Lucene from 2.1 to 2.3, so the index format has >>>> changed") >>>> >>>> I'm not sure how Luke get's that ... it's not exposed via a public API on >>>> an IndexReader. >>>> >>>> Hmm... SegmentInfos.readCurrentVersion(Directory) seems like it would do >>>> the trick; but i'm not sure how that would interact with customized >>>> INdexReader implementations. i suppose we could always make it non-fatal >>>> if it throws an exception (just print the exception mesg in place of hte >>>> number) >>>> >>>> anybody want to submit a patch to add this to the LukeRequestHandler? >>>> >>>> >>>> -Hoss >>>> >>> >>> >> > > > > -- > Lici > -- Lici
