Thanks Avlesh. But I didn't get it. How a dynamic field would aggregate values in query time?
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Avlesh Singh<avl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dynamic fields might be an answer. If you had a field called "product_*" and > these were populated with the corresponding values during indexing then > faceting on these fields will give you the desired behavior. > > The only catch here is that the product names have to be known upfront. A > wildcard support for field names in facet.fl is still to come in Solr. > Here's the issue - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-247 > > Cheers > Avlesh > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:33 AM, David Lojudice Sobrinho > <dalss...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I can't reindex because the aggregated/grouped result should change as >> the query changes... in other words, the result must by dynamic >> >> We've been thinking about a new handler for it.... something like: >> >> >> /select?q=laptop&rows=0&itemfacet=on&itemfacet.field=product_name,min(price),max(price) >> >> Does it make sense? Something easier ready to use? >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Ge, Yao (Y.)<y...@ford.com> wrote: >> > If you can reindex, simply rebuild the index with fields replaced by >> > combining existing fields. >> > -Yao >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: David Lojudice Sobrinho [mailto:dalss...@gmail.com] >> > Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 4:17 PM >> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >> > Subject: Item Facet >> > >> > Hi... >> > >> > Is there any way to group values like shopping.yahoo.com or >> > shopper.cnet.com do? >> > >> > For instance, I have documents like: >> > >> > doc1 - product_name1 - value1 >> > doc2 - product_name1 - value2 >> > doc3 - product_name1 - value3 >> > doc4 - product_name2 - value4 >> > doc5 - product_name2 - value5 >> > doc6 - product_name2 - value6 >> > >> > I'd like to have a result grouping by product name with the value >> > range per product. Something like: >> > >> > product_name1 - (value1 to value3) >> > product_name2 - (value4 to value6) >> > >> > It is not like the current facet because the information is grouped by >> > item, not the entire result. >> > >> > Any idea? >> > >> > Thanks! >> > >> > David Lojudice Sobrinho >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> __________________ >> >> David L. S. >> dalss...@gmail.com >> __________________ >> > -- __________________ David L. S. dalss...@gmail.com __________________
