I have been a satisfied DIH user for a long time. The project I use Solr for, runs on a MySQL (5.1) version. There are 6 solr-cores in total with a combined index size of 12G. The database design is as relational as it can get, and writing SQL queries to fetch the data has always been always a problem. Thanks to DIH, I have honed my DB concepts and created nice procedure and views to faltten out data. For DIH, I have kept it simple select statements (or procedure calls) with a few entities and pushed the heavylifting to database(scripts).
I am talking about 4million records here. I have never tried LuSQL. Cheers Avlesh On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Amit Nithian <anith...@gmail.com> wrote: > All, > An off and on project of mine has been to work on refactoring the way we > load data from MySQL into Solr. Our current approach is fairly hard coded > and not configurable as I would like. I was curious of people who have used > the DIH and/or LuSQL to load data into Solr, how much data you typically > load and obstacles you have run into along the way. For example, some of > our > SQL queries are quite complex with a bunch of joins which can cause > headaches for the DB. > > I am mainly curious for those who use MySQL for comparison. I am also > looking to evaluate DIH vs LuSQL (the 0.9.3 which I read about but haven't > seen for download). Has any progress been made on the making DIH a separate > library? > > Sorry for the flurry of questions but am interested in everyones response! > > Thanks > Amit >