The you should consider replicating the index to the local intranet and still run that it as a separate app.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Ninad Raut<hbase.user.ni...@gmail.com> wrote: > The remote web app will be accessing the Solr server via internet. Its not a > intranet setup. > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Walter Underwood > <wun...@wunderwood.org>wrote: > >> About the first option, caches are more effective with more traffic, so ten >> front end servers using three Solr servers will have better caching and >> probably better overall performance than having separate search on all ten >> servers. You can even put an HTTP cache in there and get better caching. >> >> Cached HTTP responses are usually faster than accessing disc locally. >> >> You say you have a "remote web application". How remote? If the indexes are >> big, then copying them to a remote location is a lot of traffic. >> >> wunder >> >> On Aug 6, 2009, at 8:49 PM, Ninad Raut wrote: >> >> Hi Noble, >>> Can you explain a bit more on how to use Solr "out of the box". I am >>> looking at ways to design the UI for remote application quickly and with >>> less problems. >>> Also could you elaborate more on what can go wrong with the first option? >>> Thanks. >>> >>> 2009/8/6 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् <noble.p...@corp.aol.com> >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Ninad Raut<hbase.user.ni...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> I have a search engine on Solr. Also I have a remote web application >>>>> >>>> which >>>> >>>>> will be using the Solr Indexes for search. >>>>> I have three scenarios: >>>>> 1) Transfer the Indexes to the Remote Application. >>>>> >>>>> - This will reduce load on the actual solr server and make seraches >>>>> faster. >>>>> - Need to write some code to transfer the index >>>>> - Need to double my effort to update,merge,optimize index >>>>> >>>>> 2)Use HTTP GET >>>>> >>>>> - Will increase load on the Solr server >>>>> - No extra code needed for transfer >>>>> >>>> This by far is the best solution. ecause you do not have to do any >>>> work at all. It all works out of the box and that is what everyone >>>> uses >>>> >>>>> >>>>> 3) Embedded Serach >>>>> >>>>> - Use SolrJ for querying >>>>> >>>>> I want to know which is the best approach. >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Ninad Raut. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> ----------------------------------------------------- >>>> Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com >>>> >>>> >> > -- ----------------------------------------------------- Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com
