You are right. Replication was disabled after the server was restarted, and then I saw the behavior. After I added some data, command "indexversion" returns the right values. So it seems Solr behaved correctly.
Thanks, 2009/8/5 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् <noble.p...@corp.aol.com> > how is the replicationhandler configured? if there was no > commit/optimize thhen it would show the version as '0' > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 5:50 AM, solr jay<solr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > http://localhost:8549/solr/replication?command=enablereplication > > > > does not seem working. After making the request, I run > > > > http://localhost:8549/solr/replication?command=indexversion > > > > and here is the response: > > > > > > <response> > > <lst name="responseHeader"> > > <int name="status">0</int> > > <int name="QTime">0</int> > > </lst> > > <long name="indexversion">0</long> > > <long name="generation">0</long> > > </response> > > > > > > Notice the indexversion is 0, which is the value after you disable > > replication. On the other hand > > > > http://localhost:8549/solr/replication?command=details > > > > returns: > > > > > > <response> > > > > <lst name="responseHeader"> > > <int name="status">0</int> > > <int name="QTime">7</int> > > </lst> > > > > <lst name="details"> > > <str name="indexSize">692 bytes</str> > > > > <str name="indexPath"> > > /tmp/solr/solrdata/index > > </str> > > <arr name="commits"/> > > <str name="isMaster">true</str> > > <str name="isSlave">false</str> > > <long name="indexVersion">1249517184279</long> > > <long name="generation">2</long> > > > > <lst name="master"> > > <str name="replicateAfter">commit</str> > > </lst> > > </lst> > > > > <str name="WARNING"> > > This response format is experimental. It is likely to change in the > future. > > </str> > > </response> > > > > > > Notice that the indexversion is 1249517184279. > > > > thanks, > > > > -- > > J > > > > > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------- > Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com > -- J
