Thanks Otis, The thread suggests that this is bug http://markmail.org/message/ts65a6jok3ii6nva#query:+page:1+mid:qinymqdn6mkocv4k
Both SSE and ICS are 3 letter word and both are not part of English language. SEE* works fine and ICS* does not work, this is sure a bug. Any idea when will this bug be fixed or if there is any work around. ---- Thanks/Regards, Parvez GV : 786-693-2228 On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Otis Gospodnetic < otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Could it be the same reason as described here: > > http://markmail.org/message/ts65a6jok3ii6nva > > Otis > -- > Sematext is hiring -- http://sematext.com/about/jobs.html?mls > Lucene, Solr, Nutch, Katta, Hadoop, HBase, UIMA, NLP, NER, IR > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Mohamed Parvez <par...@gmail.com> > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2009 11:26:45 AM > > Subject: Wild card search does not return any result > > > > Hello All, > > > > I have two fields. > > > > > > > > > > I have document(which has been indexed) that has a value of "ICS for BUS > > field" and "SSE for ROLE filed" > > > > When I search for q=BUS:ics i get the result, but if i search for > q=BUS:ics* > > i don't get any match (or result) > > > > when I search for q=ROLE:sse or q=ROLE:sse*, both the times I get the > > result. > > > > why BUS:ics* does not return any result ? > > > > > > I have the default configuration for text filed, see below. > > > > > > positionIncrementGap="100"> > > > > > > > > > > > > ignoreCase="true" > > words="stopwords.txt" > > enablePositionIncrements="true" > > /> > > > > generateWordParts="1" generateNumberParts="1" catenateWords="1" > > catenateNumbers="1" catenateAll="0" splitOnCaseChange="1"/> > > > > > > protected="protwords.txt"/> > > > > > > > > > > > > ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/> > > > > words="stopwords.txt"/> > > > > generateWordParts="1" generateNumberParts="1" catenateWords="0" > > catenateNumbers="0" catenateAll="0" splitOnCaseChange="1"/> > > > > > > protected="protwords.txt"/> > > > > > > > > > > > > ---- > > Thanks/Regards, > > Parvez > > > > Note : This is a re-post. looks like something went wrong the first time > > around. > >
