FYI
Attached schema.xml file.
And the add doc xml snippets are,
<add>
<doc>
<field name="evid">501</field>
<field name="ssid">ESQ.VISION.A72</field>
<field name="evnum">201</field>
<field name="evtext">CpuLoopEnd Process=$Z4B1 CpuPin=0,992
Program=\VEGAS.$SYSTEM.SYS00.MEASFH Terminal=\VEGAS.$TSPM.#TERM
CpuBusy=0 MemPage=24 User=50,10</field>
<field name="proc">\VEGAS.$QQDS</field>
<field name="layer">PLGOVNPM</field>
<field name="evtime">2008-10-07T03:00:30.0Z</field>
<field name="logtime">2008-10-07T10:02:27.95Z</field>
<field name="curts">1247905648000</field>
</doc>
.....
</add>
i just load the currentTimeStamps long value into the add doc xml to
load into solr.
Chris Hostetter wrote:
I'm not really understanding how you could get the situation you describe
... which suggests that one (or both) of us don't understand exactly what
happened.
if you can post the actual schema.xml file you used and an example of the
input you indexed perhaps we can spot the discrepency.
FWIW: using a timestamp as a uniqueKey doesn't make much sense ...
1) if you have heavy parallelization two docs indexed at the exact same
time might overwrite eachother.
2) you have no way of ever replacing an existing doc (unless you roll the
clock back) in which case there's no advantage to using a uniqueKey --
so you might as leave it out of your schema (which makes indexing
slightly faster)
: I need to run around 10 million records to index, by solr.
: I has nearly 2lakh records, so i made a program to looping it till 10 million.
: Here, i specified 20 fields in schema.xml file. the unoque field i set was,
: currentTimeStamp field.
: So, when i run the loader program (which loads xml data into solr) it creates
: currentTimestamp value...and loads into solr.
:
: For this situation,
: i stopped the loader program, after 100 records indexed into solr.
: Then again, i run the loader program for the SAME 100 records to indexed
: means,
: the solr results 100, rather than 200.
:
: Because, i set currentTimeStamp field as uniqueField. So i expect the result
: as 200, if i run again the same 100 records...
:
: Any suggestions please...
-Hoss
