I guess initialDelay can be set to 0. that should solve this .. On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Yonik Seeley<yo...@lucidimagination.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Mark Miller<markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I wonder if using a 0 initialDelay would make more sense? > > Hmmm, that raises the question of when an initialDelay > 0 does make > sense... what's the use case? > > -Yonik > http://www.lucidimagination.com >
-- ----------------------------------------------------- Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com
