Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: > > Can't you have two fields like this? > > f1 (indexed, not stored) -> one two three four [METAINFO] oneprime > twoprime > threeprime fourprime > f2 (not indexed, stored) -> one two three four >
Perhaps I don't understand highlighting, but won't that prevent snippets from returning correctly? E.g. if someone searches for [twoprime], and f1 is not stored, then there will be a match on the token "twoprime", but no way to correlate that with the word "two" in a snippet result. Or is there? I have looked at the Highlighter code some and I see that it gets fragments from all fields... so maybe there's something more complicated going on that will cause it to correctly return one <em>two</em> three four from f2? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Modifying-a-stored-field-after-analyzing-it--tp24426623p24427303.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
