>
> Also, most (none?) Query objects do not have a parseable toString
> representation so it may not even work at all.
>

IMO, this behavior is limited to the Subclasses of SpanQuery.
Anyways, I understand the general notion here.

Cheers
Avlesh

On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Avlesh Singh <avl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Point taken, Erik. But, is there really a downside towards using
> > Query.toString() if someone is not using any of the complex Query
> > Subclasses
> > (like a SpanQuery)?
> >
>
> Well, you will be relying on undocumented behavior that might change in
> future releases.
>
> Also, most (none?) Query objects do not have a parseable toString
> representation so it may not even work at all.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
>

Reply via email to