I came across this article praising Sphinx: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/05/08/dziuba_sphinx/. The article specifically mentions Solr as an 'aging' technology, and states that performance on Sphinx is 2x-4x faster than Solr. Has anyone compared Sphinx to Solr? Or used Sphinx in the past? I realize that you can't just say one is faster than the other because it depends so much on configuration, requirements, # docs, size of each doc, etc. I'm just looking for general observations. I've found other articles comparing Solr with Sphinx and most state that performance is similar between the two.
Thanks, Wojtek -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Solr-vs-Sphinx-tp23524676p23524676.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
