Several options: - use tmpfs (loads everything in RAM) - force the FS/OS to cache your index (e.g. cat /path/to/index/* > /dev/null) - warm up your index well (e.g. *:* + sort queries if you sort) - make use of Solr caches
Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch ----- Original Message ---- > From: mirage1987 <mirage1...@gmail.com> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:25:27 AM > Subject: Getting better performance frm Solr > > > hi, > I was wondering how we can improve the query response time from solr. > Is it possible to put my index into ram to increase performance.Does solr > provide any such functionality??? > (like RAMDirectory in lucene.) (working on linux) > I tried to put the index in /dev/shm/ but didn't get ny performance boost > relative to when i had it on disk. > (my index is around 600 MB and i have plenty of ram 8gb) > > My underlying lucene is providing an avg queryresponse time of 84 ms > Any idea how much solr would add to this??....can i reduce that time??? > > Thanx. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Getting-better-performance-frm-Solr-tp23313500p23313500.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
