Hi Hoss, 
thanks for this answser, and is there a way to get the weight of a field ? 
like that and use it in the bf? queryWeight


  0.14232224 = (MATCH) weight(text:chien^0.2 in 9412049), product of:
    0.0813888 = queryWeight(text:chien^0.2), product of:
      0.2 = boost
      6.5946517 = idf(docFreq=55585, numDocs=14951742)
      0.061708186 = queryNorm


thanks 


hossman wrote:
> 
> 
> : I don't get really, I try to boost a field according to another one but
> I've
> : a huge weight when I'm using qf boost like :
> : 
> : /select?qt=dismax&fl=*&q="obama
> : meeting"&debugQuery=true&qf=title&bf=product(title,stat_views)
> 
> bf is a boost function -- you are using a product fucntion to multiply the 
> "title" field by the stat_views" field ... this doesn't make sense to me?
> 
> i'm assuming the "title" field contains text (the rest of your score 
> explanation confirms this).  when you try to do a math function on a 
> string based field it deals with the "ordinal" value -- the higher the 
> string is lexigraphically compared to all other docs ,the higher the 
> ordinal value.
> 
> i have no idea what's in your stat_views field -- but i can't imagine any 
> way in which multipling it by the ordinal value of your text field would 
> make sense...
> 
> :   5803675.5 = (MATCH)
> FunctionQuery(product(ord(title),sint(stat_views))),
> : product of:
> :     9.5142968E7 = product(ord(title)=1119329,sint(stat_views)=85)
> :     1.0 = boost
> :     0.06099952 = queryNorm
> 
> : But this is not equilibrate between this boost in qf and bf, how can I
> do ?
> 
> when it comes to function query, you're on your own to figure out an 
> appropriate query boost to blanace the scores out -- when you use a 
> product function the scores are going to get huge like this unless you 
> balance it somehow (and that ord(title) is just making this massively 
> worse)
> 
> 
> -Hoss
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/boost-qf-weight-between-0-and-10-tp22081396p23257545.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to