righto. feel like a bummer for asking that in retrospect. thanks for the clarification :-)
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Otis Gospodnetic < otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > That is true *only if* you combine those 2 clauses with AND. It's not true > with OR. > > > Otis -- > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Shrutipriya <shrutipr...@gmail.com> > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 11:45:30 PM > > Subject: Re: MLT for sorting results? > > > > true. but in the normal process of search Solr uses parametric fields as > > filters. so if i do the following search keyword = java team lead ; > location > > (parametric)=delhi, i will not get docs that match the keywords > > exactly with a different location. > > > > -shruti > > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 3:29 AM, Otis Gospodnetic < > > otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > What you describe is what normal Solr search does already - you can > think > > > of the query as a very small document and the search as a process that > tries > > > to find documents in the index that are the most similar to that "query > > > document". > > > > > > Otis > > > -- > > > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > > > From: Shrutipriya > > > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 1:50:25 PM > > > > Subject: MLT for sorting results? > > > > > > > > hi, > > > > > > > > i was wondering if anyone has used solr MLT ("more like this") for > > > sorting > > > > search results i.e. documents that are "most" like the query appear > on > > > > top and so on. so the query is itself treated like a document and one > > > tries > > > > finding docs "similar" to it from the corpus. > > > > > > > > is there a way to set precision in the MLT handler to help with > sorting? > > > > (documents that match 99.9% on top, then 99% .... down to 0.1% or > > > whatever) > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > shruti > > > > > > > >
