Hi Noble, Yes exactly that, I would like to know how people do during a replication ? Do they turn off servers and put a high autowarmCount which turn off the slave for a while like for my case, 10mn to bring back the new index and then autowarmCount maybe 10 minutes more.
Otherwise I tried to put large number of mergefactor but I guess I've too much update every 30mn something like 2000docs and almost all segment are modified. What would you reckon? :( .... :) Thanks a lot Noble Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote: > > So what I decipher from the numbers is w/o queries Solr replication is > not performing too badly. The queries are inherently slow and you wish > to optimize the query performance itself. > am I correct? > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 7:50 PM, sunnyfr <johanna...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> So I did two test on two servers; >> >> First server : with just replication every 20mn like you can notice: >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p22930179/cpu_without_request.png >> cpu_without_request.png >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p22930179/cpu2_without_request.jpg >> cpu2_without_request.jpg >> >> Second server : with one first replication and a second one during query >> test: between 15:32pm and 15h41 >> during replication (checked on .../admin/replication/index.jsp) my >> respond >> time query at the end was around 5000msec >> after the replication I guess during commitment I couldn't get answer of >> my >> query for a long time, I refreshed my page few minutes after. >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p22930179/cpu_with_request.png >> cpu_with_request.png >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p22930179/cpu2_with_request.jpg >> cpu2_with_request.jpg >> >> Now without replication I kept going query on the second server, and I >> can't >> get better than >> 1000msec repond time and 11request/second. >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p22930179/cpu_.jpg cpu_.jpg >> >> This is my request : >> select?fl=id&fq=status_published:1+AND+status_moderated:0+AND+status_personal:0+AND+status_private:0+AND+status_deleted:0+AND+status_error:0+AND+status_ready_web:1&json.nl=map&wt=json&start=0&version=1.2&bq=status_official:1^1.5+OR+status_creative:1^1+OR+language:en^0.5&bf=recip(rord(created),1,10,10)^3+pow(stat_views,0.1)^15+pow(stat_comments,0.1)^15&rows=100&qt=dismax&qf=title_en^0.8+title^0.2+description_en^0.3+description^0.2+tags^1+owner_login^0.5 >> >> Do you have advice ? >> >> Thanks Noble >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/solr-1.4-memory-jvm-tp22913742p22930179.html >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > > -- > --Noble Paul > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/solr-1.4-memory-jvm-tp22913742p22966630.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
