On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Joe Pollard <joe.poll...@bazaarvoice.com>wrote:
> It doesn't seem to matter whether fields are stored or not, but I've > found a rather striking difference in the memory requirements during > sorting. Sorting on a string field representing datetime like > '2008-08-12T12:18:26.510' is about twice as memory intense as sorting > first by '2008-08-12' and then by '121826'. > > Any other tips/guidance like this would be great! > There are a lot of threads on memory usage on the mailing list. Searching on the mailing list will give you a lot of information. http://lucene.markmail.org/search/solr+sorting+memory -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.