OK . That is not a good solution.

In Solr, you can only have a flat document structure. Where each field
is a primitive (String, Number, Date) or a List of primitives.So, the
SolrJ API only supports these . You may really not need a Custome
type.



On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Praveen Kumar Jayaram
<praveen198...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Noble,
>
> Storing fields as Strings means I have to use a POJO for this activity
> right? If so I am done.
> But according to your suggestion "Let the FieldType in Solr parse and create
> appropriate data structure".
> How am I going to do this? Am very new to Solr. So please don't mind if I
> dumb questions.
>
> Please give some sample example if possible.
>
>
>
> Noble Paul നോബിള്‍  नोब्ळ् wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Praveen Kumar Jayaram
>> <praveen198...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for the reply Noble Paul.
>>> In my application I will be having multiple types of object and the
>>> number
>>> of properties in each object will vary.
>>> So I have made them as FieldType and defined in schema.xml also
>> The POJO is a client side Object. It is converted to xml before
>> POSTING the data to Solr. The client side code is totally agnostic of
>> the field type in Solr schema.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> How do I store  the POJO without declaring it as a FieldType?
>>> Solr needs to recognize a type right?
>>
>> What you can do is to write your field value as one String. Let the
>> FieldType in Solr parse and create appropriate data structure.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Noble Paul നോബിള്‍  नोब्ळ् wrote:
>>>>
>>>> why is the POJO extending FieldType?
>>>> it does not have to.
>>>>
>>>> composite types are not supported.because Solr cannot support that.
>>>> But the field can be a List or array.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Praveen Kumar Jayaram
>>>> <praveen198...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Could someone give suggestions for this issue?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Praveen Kumar Jayaram wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am trying to have a complex POJO type in Solr 1.3
>>>>>> i.e Object inside object.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Below is a sample Field created,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> public class TestType extends FieldType{
>>>>>>     @Field
>>>>>>     private String requestorID_s_i_s_nm;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     @Field
>>>>>>     private String partNumber;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     @Field
>>>>>>     private String requestorName_s_i_s_nm;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     @Field
>>>>>>     private InnerType innerType;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Where InnerType is another custom Java type.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> public class InnerType extends FieldType{
>>>>>>       private String name_s_i_s_nm;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The schema configuration is as shown below,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ....
>>>>>> <fieldType name="TestType" class="com.abc.lucene.TestType"
>>>>>> sortMissingLast="true" omitNorms="true"/>
>>>>>> <fieldType name="InnerType" class="com.abc.lucene.InnerType"
>>>>>> sortMissingLast="true" omitNorms="true"/>
>>>>>> ....
>>>>>> ....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When I try to add an TestType POJO using below code, am getting unkown
>>>>>> field "innerType" error,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> String url = "http://localhost:8983/solr";;
>>>>>> SolrServer server = new CommonsHttpSolrServer( url );
>>>>>>
>>>>>> InnerType inner = new InnerType();
>>>>>> inner.setName_s_i_s_nm("Test");
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TestType praveen = new TestType();
>>>>>> praveen.setPartNumber("000001-0001");
>>>>>> praveen.setRequestorID_s_i_s_nm("1111");
>>>>>> praveen.setRequestorName_s_i_s_nm("Praveen Kumar Jayaram");
>>>>>> praveen.setInnerType(inner);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> server.addBean(praveen);
>>>>>> UpdateRequest req = new UpdateRequest();
>>>>>> req.setAction( UpdateRequest.ACTION.COMMIT, false, false );
>>>>>> UpdateResponse res = req.process(server);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Initially POJO was getting added when it was not composite POJO.
>>>>>> After trying to have composite POJO things are not working.
>>>>>> What is that I am doing wrong??
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any help will be appreciated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Praveen
>>>>> --
>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>> http://www.nabble.com/Composite-POJO-support-tp22841854p22845799.html
>>>>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> --Noble Paul
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Regards,
>>> Praveen
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://www.nabble.com/Composite-POJO-support-tp22841854p22862433.html
>>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --Noble Paul
>>
>>
>
>
> -----
> Regards,
> Praveen
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/Composite-POJO-support-tp22841854p22902406.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>



-- 
--Noble Paul

Reply via email to