If you are looking at the QTime on the master it is likely to be skewed by ReplicationHandler becaus ethe files are downloaded using a request. On a slave it should not be a problem.
I guess we must not add the qtimes of ReplicationHandler --Noble On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 5:34 PM, sunnyfr <johanna...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Just applied replication by requestHandler. > And since this the Qtime went mad and can reach long time <int > name="QTime">9068</int> > Without this replication Qtime can be around 1sec. > > I've 14Mdocs stores for 11G. so not a lot of data stores. > I've servers with 8G and tomcat use 7G. > I'm updating every 30mn which is about 50 000docs. > Have a look as well at my cpu which are aswell quite full ? > > Have you an idea? Do I miss a patch ? > Thanks a lot, > > Solr Specification Version: 1.3.0.2009.01.22.13.51.22 > Solr Implementation Version: 1.4-dev exported - root - 2009-01-22 13:51:22 > > http://www.nabble.com/file/p22846336/CPU.jpg CPU.jpg > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/JVM-best-tune--help-...-solr1.4-tp22846336p22846336.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- --Noble Paul
