On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Gargate, Siddharth <sgarg...@ptc.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>    I just want to clear few things.
> As far as I know, javabin is the default format used by SolrJ while
> searching.
> And for update requests default format is XML; XMLUpdateRequestHandler
> is used.
> If we set the request writer to BinaryRequestWriter then update request
> is in javabin format and BinaryUpdateRequestHandler is used.
> BinaryRequestWriter is supposed to be fast and efficient.
> After SOLR-973 update request is still in XML format, but the XML is
> directly written to the server.



Your understanding is correct
> Please correct me if I am wrong about the default behavior. Also, please
> let me know which one would be better in performance,
> XMLUpdateRequestHandler or BinaryUpdateRequestHandler?

BinaryUpdateRequestHandler is faster because you do not have the xml
parsing overhead and the datasize is small (so less bandwidth) .
>
> Thanks,
> Siddharth
>



-- 
--Noble Paul
  • javabin vs xml Gargate, Siddharth
    • Re: javabin vs xm... Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्

Reply via email to