Yeah, I realized after sending my note that (a) I'm an idiot, and (b) ... well, there's no (b).
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Otis Gospodnetic < otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Bill, > > You said you are actually getting only the "notes" part of your query, but > you clearly get the "nature" part as well (it's just that it's not > required): > > +(+(title:note)~0.01 (title:natur)~0.01) () > > Otis > -- > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Bill Dueber <b...@dueber.com> > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 2:47:00 PM > > Subject: Dismax: why is "+term1 term2" equivalent to "+term1"?? > > > > I'm using the dismax handler and don't understand the results I'm > getting. > > Scouring the archives makes me believe that I am, in fact, the only one > who > > doesn't get this. > > > > Using dismax search on a single field (title), I would expect that the > query > > > > +notes nature > > > > would be read as "Must include 'notes' in the title field; may also > include > > 'nature' in the title field." What I actually get looks to be equivalent > to > > just "+notes". > > > > The parsed query looks like so: > > > > > > +(+(title:note)~0.01 (title:natur)~0.01) () > > > > > > I've futzed around with mm, to no avail. Which boat am I missing??? How > do I > > get the functionality I'm shooting for? > > > > Setup info: > > > > > > 0 > > 2 > > > > 0<0% > > > > id,title,score > > > > all > > 0.01 > > > > title > > > > 100 > > dismax > > one > > on > > +notes nature > > 0 > > > > > > -- Bill Dueber Library Systems Programmer University of Michigan Library
