My quick grep of the sources and scan of the results doesn't see any problematic areas, but if you see some places that still need a fix, yes, please reopen the issue and submit the patch. Do you also plan on submitting the actual alternative Directory impl?
$ ffjg FSDire | egrep 'SolrIndexW|SolrCore|UpdateH' ./src/java/org/apache/solr/core/SolrCore.java:import org.apache.lucene.store.FSDirectory; ./src/java/org/apache/solr/core/SolrCore.java: //return new SolrIndexSearcher(this, schema, "main", IndexReader.open(FSDirectory.getDirectory(getIndexDir()), readOnly), true, false); Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch ----- Original Message ---- > From: Andrey Klochkov <akloch...@griddynamics.com> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 10:22:57 AM > Subject: alternative lucene directories support > > Hi all > > We want to use Solr with lucene Directory implementation which places index > into Coherence data grid. > I fact I managed to run Solr in such configuration although I had to patch > it. > I think that the issue about alternate directories support (SOLR-465) should > be re-opened because there are some places in source code where FSDirectory > hard-coding is still present (SolrCore, SolrIndexWriter and UpdateHandler). > I can provide a patch to fix it. > > WDYT? > > -- > Andrew Klochkov
