Hello Marc,

I faced the similar problem, and I found a workaround.
If the performance degradation in your application is caused by GC,
this information might help you:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1042

Regards,
Ryuuichi Kumai.

2009/2/21 Marc Sturlese <marc.sturl...@gmail.com>:
>
> I am working with 3 index of 1 gig each. I am using the standard setting of
> the GC, haven't changed anything and using java version "1.6.0_07".
> I don't know so much about GV configuration... just read this
>
> http://marcus.net/blog/2007/11/10/solr-search-and-java-gc-tuning/
>
> when a month ago I exeprienced another problem with Solr (at the end it was
> not GV's fault). So, any advice about wich GC should I try or what should I
> tune?
>
> Thank you very much!
>
>
>
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Marc Sturlese
>> <marc.sturl...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Yes,
>>> Now it's almost tree days non-stop since I am running updates with the 3
>>> cores with cron jobs. If there are updates of 10000 docs everything is
>>> alrite. When I start doing updates of 300000 is when that core runs
>>> really
>>> slow. I have to abort the import in that core and keep updating with less
>>> rows each time.
>>> Another thing to point is that tomcat reaches the maximum memory I allow
>>> (2Gig) and never goes down (but at least it doesn't run out of memory).
>>> Is
>>> that normal? Shouldn't the memory go down a lot after an update is
>>> completed?
>>>
>>
>> I guess you are being hit by garbage collection. Memory utilization should
>> go down once an import completes. Which GC are you using? There have been
>> a
>> few recent threads on GC settings. Perhaps you can try out a few of those
>> settings. I don't know how big your documents/index are but if possible
>> give
>> it more memory.
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/concurrency-problem-with-delta-import-%28indexing-various-cores-simultaniously%29-tp22120430p22125716.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Reply via email to