How can I remove from time to time, because for the script snapcleaner I just have the option to delete last day ??? thanks a lot Noble and sorry again for all this question,
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote: > > The hardlinks will prevent the unused files from getting cleaned up. > So the diskspace is consumed for unused index files also. You may need > to delete unused snapshots from time to time > --Noble > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:24 AM, sunnyfr <johanna...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Noble, >> >> I maybe don't get something >> Ok if it's hard link but how come i've not space left on device error and >> 30G shown on the data folder ?? >> sorry I'm quite new >> >> 6.0G /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216214502 >> 35M /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216195003 >> 12M /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216195502 >> 12K /data/solr/book/data/spellchecker2 >> 36M /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216185502 >> 37M /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216203502 >> 6.0M /data/solr/book/data/index >> 12K /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216204002 >> 5.8G /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216172020 >> 12K /data/solr/book/data/spellcheckerFile >> 28K /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216200503 >> 40K /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216194002 >> 24K /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216200002 >> 32K /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216184502 >> 20K /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216191004 >> 1.1M /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216213502 >> 1.1M /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216201502 >> 1.1M /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216213005 >> 24K /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216191502 >> 1.1M /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216212503 >> 107M /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216212002 >> 14M /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216190502 >> 32K /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216201002 >> 2.3M /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216204502 >> 28K /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216184002 >> 5.8G /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216181425 >> 44K /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216190001 >> 20K /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216183401 >> 1.1M /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216203002 >> 44K /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216194502 >> 36K /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216185004 >> 12K /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216182720 >> 12K /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216214001 >> 5.8G /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216175106 >> 1.1M /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216202003 >> 5.8G /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216173224 >> 12K /data/solr/book/data/spellchecker1 >> 1.1M /data/solr/book/data/snapshot.20090216202502 >> 30G /data/solr/book/data >> thanks a lot, >> >> >> Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote: >>> >>> they are just hardlinks. they do not consume space on disk >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:34 PM, sunnyfr <johanna...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Ok but can I use it more often then every day like every three hours, >>>> because snapshot are quite big. >>>> >>>> Thanks a lot, >>>> >>>> >>>> Bill Au wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The --delete option of the rsync command deletes extraneous files from >>>>> the >>>>> destination directory. It does not delete Solr snapshots. To do that >>>>> you >>>>> can use the snapcleaner on the master and/or slave. >>>>> >>>>> Bill >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:15 AM, sunnyfr <johanna...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> root 26834 16.2 0.0 19412 824 ? S 16:05 0:08 >>>>>> rsync >>>>>> -Wa >>>>>> --delete rsync://##.##.##.##:18180/solr/snapshot.20090213160051/ >>>>>> /data/solr/books/data/snapshot.20090213160051-wip >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi obviously it can't delete them because the adress is bad it >>>>>> shouldnt >>>>>> be >>>>>> : >>>>>> rsync://##.##.##.##:18180/solr/snapshot.20090213160051/ >>>>>> but: >>>>>> rsync://##.##.##.##:18180/solr/books/snapshot.20090213160051/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Where should I change this, I checked my script.conf on the slave >>>>>> server >>>>>> but >>>>>> it seems good. >>>>>> >>>>>> Because files can be very big and my server in few hours is getting >>>>>> full. >>>>>> >>>>>> So actually snapcleaner is not necessary on the master ? what about >>>>>> the >>>>>> slave? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks a lot, >>>>>> Sunny >>>>>> -- >>>>>> View this message in context: >>>>>> http://www.nabble.com/delete-snapshot---tp21998333p21998333.html >>>>>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: >>>> http://www.nabble.com/delete-snapshot---tp21998333p22041332.html >>>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> --Noble Paul >>> >>> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/delete-snapshot---tp21998333p22048398.html >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > > -- > --Noble Paul > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/delete-snapshot---tp21998333p22052570.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
