Could it be the framework you are using around it?  I know some IOC
containers will auto pool objects underneath as a service without you really
knowing it is being done or has to be explicitly turned off.  Just a
thought.  I use a single server for all requests behind a Hivemind setup ...
umm not by choice :-\

- Jon

On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Ryan McKinley <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> if you use this constructor:
>
>  public CommonsHttpSolrServer(URL baseURL, HttpClient client)
>
> then solrj never touches the HttpClient configuration.
>
> I normally reuse a single CommonsHttpSolrServer as well.
>
>
>
> On Jan 27, 2009, at 9:52 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:
>
>  Making requests in parallel, using the default connection manager,
>> which is multi-threaded, and we are reusing a single CommonsHttpSolrServer
>> for all requests.
>>
>> wunder
>>
>> On 1/26/09 10:59 PM, "Noble Paul നോബിള്‍  नोब्ळ्" <noble.p...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  are you making requests in parallel ?
>>> which ConnectionManager are you using for HttpClient?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള്‍  नोब्ळ्
>>> <noble.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> you can set any connection parameters for the HttpClient and pass on
>>>> the instance to CommonsHttpSolrServer and that will be used for making
>>>> requests
>>>>
>>>> make sure that you are not reusing instance of CommonsHttpSolrServer
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Walter Underwood
>>>> <wunderw...@netflix.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> We just switched to Solrj from a home-grown client and we have a huge
>>>>> jump in the number of connections to the server, enough that our
>>>>> load balancer was rejecting connections in production tonight.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does that sound familiar? We're running 1.3.
>>>>>
>>>>> I set the timeouts and connection pools to the same values I'd
>>>>> used in my other code, also based on HTTPClient.
>>>>>
>>>>> We can roll back to my code temporarily, but we want some of
>>>>> the Solrj facet support for a new project.
>>>>>
>>>>> wunder
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> --Noble Paul
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to