Can you share your code? Or reduce it down to a repeatable test?
On Jan 20, 2009, at 8:22 AM, edre...@ha wrote:
Grant Ingersoll-6 wrote:
Do they show up if you use non-embedded? That is, if you hit that
slave over HTTP from your browser, are the changes showing up?
Yes. Changing the config to access the server over HTTP works
fine. When
looking at our console logs for the Solr Server, I can see no
discernable
difference between the embedded and HTTP approaches. The
snapinstaller
appears to be working in both cases, but changes to the index don't
show up
in queries when the slave is configured as embedded.
I'm moving forward with the HTTP approach, but the embedded approach
is
desirable for two (obvious) reasons: 1) performance improvement, 2)
simpler
deployment.
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Embedded-Solr-updates-not-showing-until-restart-tp21546235p21562955.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
Lucene Helpful Hints:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ
