Solr will use multiple processors. Most of your speed will come from
cached responses. Use a single instance, test with real query logs,
and tune the cache sizes by looking at the cache hit statistics in
the statistics page of the Solr admin UI.

wunder

On 1/8/09 3:37 PM, "smock" <harish.agar...@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> Assuming I have enough RAM then, should I be able to get a performance boost
> with my current setup?  Basically, the question I am trying to answer is -
> will the Tomcat+Solr setup I have above utilize multiple processors or do I
> need to do something else (like having a different tomcat instance for each
> Solr shard)?
> 
> Also - and this question comes purely out of my own ignorance of how the
> Tomcat/Solr relationship works - right now I'm starting Tomcat specifying
> the maximum memory size.  I'm also setting cache parameters in
> solrconfig.xml for each solr instance to half of what I would for a full
> size index.  Shouldn't the JVMs for both instances use roughly the same
> total amount of memory as 1 JVM for the full size index?
> 
> While I'm testing things out on a 2 processor machine, I'll eventually be
> using an 8 proc. machine with plenty of RAM to cache the index in RAM.  I'm
> not super worried about requests/sec. right now - I'd rather each individual
> search be faster, which is why I'm interested in distributing the index
> across my 8 procs.
> 
> Thanks very much!
> -Harish
> 
> 
> 
> yonik wrote:
>> 
>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 4:51 PM, smock <harish.agar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks for the reply - could you please give me some more details on what
>>> you mean?
>> 
>> If there isn't enough memory to cache the index in RAM, then your
>> bottleneck could be from retrieving stored fields from disk.
>> Distributed search will make this much worse because you have 2 JVMs
>> eating up memory instead of one, further lowering the cache hit ratio
>> of the OS disk cache.
>> 
>> With a 2 CPU machine, a single Solr index is advisable, esp for web
>> traffic where there will be plenty of requests to keep both CPUs busy.
>> 
>> -Yonik


Reply via email to