Hello Mark,

You could have position information play a role in scoring if you use Span* 
family of queries.  I believe they are currently not supported by Solr, but I 
believe you could use QSolr + https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-896 to 
get what you need.

As for assigning different weight to fields, have a look at DisMax request 
handler - 
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxRequestHandler#head-af452050ee272a1c88e2ff89dc0012049e69e180


Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch



----- Original Message ----
> From: Mark Tovey <mto...@ionagroup.com>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2009 12:16:39 PM
> Subject: Querying based on term position possible?
> 
> I'm a relative newbie at Solr/Lucene so apologies if this question is
> overly simplistic. I have an index built and functioning as expected,
> but I am trying to build a query that can sort/score results based on
> the search terms position in the document, with a document appearing
> higher in the results list if the term appears earlier in the document.
> For example, "Red fox in the forest" would be scored over "My shoes are
> red today and my shirt is also red" if I search for the term "red". It
> seems to me that the default scoring algorithm is based more on the term
> frequency than term position, though this may be a simplistic
> interpretation. Does anyone on the list know if there is a way to
> achieve my desired results by structuring a query a certain way, or is
> this more of an indexing issue where I should have set a parameter(s) in
> my schema to a certain value? Any help is hugely appreciated as I have
> been puzzling away at this for the past couple of days with no success.
> 
> 
> 
> Alternatively, is there a way to query on two fields for a search term
> with documents being placed higher in the results if the term occurs in
> field1 over field2? I ask this because one of the fields in my schema
> (title in this case) is more deemed more important in our scenario than
> the "text" field (which holds the title plus the contents of the
> remainder of the document). I tried, for example, title:red text:red but
> again was stumped on the syntax to place an "importance" variable on
> field1 over field2.
> 
> 
> 
> Of course, it may be that what I'm trying to accomplish is simply not
> doable with the Lucene engine, at which point feel free to point out the
> error of my ways ;)
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> --Mark Tovey

Reply via email to