* SolrReplication does not create snapshots . So you have less cleanup to do. The script based replication results is more disk space consumption (especially if you do frequent commits) * Performance is roughly same unless you are replicating across different LAN where SolrReplication can zip and transfer
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think the main reason is ease of use. Warming is done the same way by > adding a newSearcher listener in solrconfig.xml > > On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 2:10 AM, Marc Sturlese <marc.sturl...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> Hey there, >> >> I would like to know the advantages of moving from: >> a master-slave system using CollectionDistribution with all their .sh >> scripts >> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CollectionDistribution >> >> to: >> use SolrReplication and his solrconfig.xml configuration. >> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication >> >> >> Its tecnically much better or mainly for more easy use? >> Does SolrReplication do warming aswell? >> >> Checking performance numbers is solrReplication wiki page things seem to be >> similar except for the RAM, are the advantages about that? >> >> Thanks in advance!! >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/collectionDistribution-vs-SolrReplication-tp21269112p21269112.html >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > -- > Regards, > Shalin Shekhar Mangar. > -- --Noble Paul
