Right, query cache typically has a lower hit ratio, and one check per request - often not worth autowarming much. The filter cache can be a different story with a higher hit ratio, and higher number of checks per request.
-Yonik On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Feak, Todd <todd.f...@smss.sony.com> wrote: > It's spending 4-5 seconds warming up your query cache. If 4-5 seconds is > too much, you could reduce the number of queries to auto-warm with on > that cache. > > Notice that the 4-5 seconds is spent only putting about 420 queries into > the query cache. Your autowarm of 50000 for the query cache seems a bit > high. If you need to reduce that autowarm time below 5 seconds, you may > have to set that value in the hundreds, as opposed to tens of thousands. > > -Todd Feak > > -----Original Message----- > From: oleg_gnatovskiy [mailto:oleg_gnatovs...@citysearch.com] > Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 10:08 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Query Performance while updating teh index > > > Here's what we have on one of the data slaves for the autowarming. > > > > -- > > Dec 12, 2008 8:46:02 AM org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher warm > > INFO: autowarming searc...@3f32ca2b main from searc...@443ad545 main > > > filterCache{lookups=351993,hits=347055,hitratio=0.98,inserts=8332,evicti > ons=0,size=8245,warmupTime=215,cumulative_lookups=2837676,cumulative_hit > s=2766551,cumulative_hitratio=0.97,cumulative_inserts=72050,cumulative_e > victions=0} > > Dec 12, 2008 8:46:02 AM org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher warm > > INFO: autowarming result for searc...@3f32ca2b main > > > filterCache{lookups=0,hits=0,hitratio=0.00,inserts=1000,evictions=0,size > =1000,warmupTime=317,cumulative_lookups=2837676,cumulative_hits=2766551, > cumulative_hitratio=0.97,cumulative_inserts=72050,cumulative_evictions=0 > } > > Dec 12, 2008 8:46:02 AM org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher warm > > INFO: autowarming searc...@3f32ca2b main from searc...@443ad545 main > > > queryResultCache{lookups=5309,hits=5223,hitratio=0.98,inserts=422,evicti > ons=0,size=421,warmupTime=4628,cumulative_lookups=77802,cumulative_hits= > 77216,cumulative_hitratio=0.99,cumulative_inserts=424,cumulative_evictio > ns=0} > > -- > > Dec 12, 2008 8:46:07 AM org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher warm > > INFO: autowarming result for searc...@3f32ca2b main > > > queryResultCache{lookups=0,hits=0,hitratio=0.00,inserts=421,evictions=0, > size=421,warmupTime=5536,cumulative_lookups=77804,cumulative_hits=77218, > cumulative_hitratio=0.99,cumulative_inserts=424,cumulative_evictions=0} > > Dec 12, 2008 8:46:07 AM org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher warm > > INFO: autowarming searc...@3f32ca2b main from searc...@443ad545 main > > > documentCache{lookups=87216,hits=86686,hitratio=0.99,inserts=570,evictio > ns=0,size=570,warmupTime=0,cumulative_lookups=1270773,cumulative_hits=12 > 68318,cumulative_hitratio=0.99,cumulative_inserts=2455,cumulative_evicti > ons=0} > > Dec 12, 2008 8:46:07 AM org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher warm > > INFO: autowarming result for searc...@3f32ca2b main > > > documentCache{lookups=0,hits=0,hitratio=0.00,inserts=0,evictions=0,size= > 0,warmupTime=0,cumulative_lookups=1270773,cumulative_hits=1268318,cumula > tive_hitratio=0.99,cumulative_inserts=2455,cumulative_evictions=0} > > -- > > > > This is our current values after I've messed with them a few times > trying to > get better performance. > > > > <filterCache > > class="solr.LRUCache" > > size="30000" > > initialSize="15000" > > autowarmCount="1000"/> > > <queryResultCache > > class="solr.LRUCache" > > size="60000" > > initialSize="30000" > > autowarmCount="50000"/> > > <documentCache > > class="solr.LRUCache" > > size="200000" > > initialSize="125000" > > autowarmCount="0"/> > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Query-Performance-while-updating-the-index-tp20452 > 835p20980669.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >
