On Nov 17, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Matthias Epheser wrote:
Just noticed that VelocityResponeWriter in trunk is very reduced to
my last
patch from 2008-07-25.
Right, that was intentional for my own simplicity's sake...
The crucial difference is the missing translation into a solrj
response by specifying the vl.response parameter. This was intended
to make template creation more handy, cause the queryResponse is
much nicer to navigate.
If this conversion is to specific and shouldn't be in
VelocityResponseWriter, would it be a problem to create a subclass
inside contrib/javascript?
I need to understand it a bit more, but no subclass is necessary...
we'll patch it into contrib/velocity's VrW like you had it before.
Erik
