Sorry, correction, taking "the" time

On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 22:18:30 +0300
uyilmaz <uyil...@vivaldi.net.INVALID> wrote:

> Thanks for taking time to write a detailed answer.
> 
> We use Solr to both store our data and to perform aggregations, using 
> faceting or streaming expressions. When required analysis is too complex to 
> do in Solr, we export large query results from Solr to a more capable 
> analysis tool.
> 
> So I guess all fields need to be docValues="true", because export handler and 
> streaming both require fields to have docValues, and even if I won't use a 
> field in queries or facets, it should be in available to read in result set. 
> Fields that won't be searched or faceted can be (indexed=false stored=false 
> docValues=true) right?
> 
> --uyilmaz
> 
> 
> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:14:27 -0400
> Michael Gibney <mich...@michaelgibney.net> wrote:
> 
> > As you've observed, it is indeed possible to facet on fields with
> > docValues=true, indexed=false; but in almost all cases you should
> > probably set indexed=true. 1. for distributed facet count refinement,
> > the "indexed" approach is used to look up counts by value; 2. assuming
> > you're wanting to do something usual, e.g. allow users to apply
> > filters based on facet counts, the filter application would use the
> > "indexed" approach as well. Where indexed=false, if either filtering
> > or distributed refinement is attempted, I'm not 100% sure what
> > happens. It might fail, or lead to inconsistent results, or attempt to
> > look up results via the equivalent of a "table scan" over docValues (I
> > think the last of these is what actually happens, fwiw) ... but none
> > of these options is likely desirable.
> > 
> > Michael
> > 
> > On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 1:42 PM uyilmaz <uyil...@vivaldi.net.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks! This also contributed to my confusion:
> > >
> > > https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_4/faceting.html#field-value-faceting-parameters
> > >
> > > "If you want Solr to perform both analysis (for searching) and faceting 
> > > on the full literal strings, use the copyField directive in your Schema 
> > > to create two versions of the field: one Text and one String. Make sure 
> > > both are indexed="true"."
> > >
> > > On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 13:08:00 -0400
> > > Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think this is all explained quite well in the Ref Guide:
> > > > https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_6/docvalues.html
> > > >
> > > > DocValues is a different way to index/store values. Faceting is a
> > > > primary use case where docValues are better than what 'indexed=true'
> > > > gives you.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >    Alex.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 12:51, uyilmaz <uyil...@vivaldi.net.invalid> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hey all,
> > > > >
> > > > > From my little experiments, I see that (if I didn't make a stupid 
> > > > > mistake) we can facet on fields marked as both indexed and stored 
> > > > > being false:
> > > > >
> > > > > <field name="nonStorednonIndexedDocvalues" type="string" 
> > > > > indexed="false" stored="false" docValues="true"/>
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm suprised by this, I thought I would need to index it. Can you 
> > > > > confirm this?
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > uyilmaz <uyil...@vivaldi.net>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > uyilmaz <uyil...@vivaldi.net>
> 
> 
> -- 
> uyilmaz <uyil...@vivaldi.net>


-- 
uyilmaz <uyil...@vivaldi.net>

Reply via email to