So to make things clear, belows what I am expecting I have a document with a unique id field lets say "uniqueID". This document has both stored/indexed and not stored/ not indexed fields Currently I have my pop values in external files but I will instead define a new field in schema (popVal) which will not be stored or indexed and have docValues=true. I am also moving _version_ field to indexed=false and stored=false, since I don't have any case where I retrieve it and use it for searching. Just hoping doing this doesn't cause any issues with updates in general (I read that keeping this as not stored and not indexed is recommended since solr 7)
Regards, Akshay On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 4:53 PM Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > Let us know how it works. I want to be sure I’m not confusing you > though. There isn’t a “doc ID field”. The structure of an eff file is > docid:value > > where docid is your <uniqueKey>. What updating numerics does is allow > you to update a field in a doc that’s identified by <unkqueKey>. That > field is any name you want as long as it’s defined respecting > the limitations in that link. > > Best, > Erick > > > On Aug 13, 2020, at 6:30 AM, Akshay Murarka <aks...@saavn.com> wrote: > > > > Hey Erick, > > > > Thanks for the information about the doc ID field. > > So our external file values are single float value fields and we do use > > them in functional queries in boost parameter, so based on the definition > > the above should work. > > So currently we use solr 5.4.0 but are in the process of upgrading our > > systems so will try out this change. > > > > Regards, > > Akshay > > > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 10:19 PM Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > >> Right, but you can use those with function queries. Assuming your eff > >> entry is a doc ID plus single numeric, I was wondering if you can > >> accomplish what you need to with function queries... > >> > >>> On Aug 10, 2020, at 11:30 AM, raj.yadav <rajkum...@cse.ism.ac.in> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Erick Erickson wrote > >>>> Ah, ok. That makes sense. I wonder if your use-case would be better > >>>> served, though, by “in place updates”, see: > >>>> > >> > https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/updating-parts-of-documents.html > >>>> This has been around in since Solr 6.5… > >>> > >>> As per documentation `in place update` is only available for numeric > >>> docValues (along with few more conditions). And here its external field > >>> type. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Raj > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Sent from: https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html > >> > >> > >
