On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 9:11 PM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > i believe the inclusion of solrj code in the core jar is intentional, the > core jar is intended (as i understand it) to encapsulate everything needed > to run "Solr" (and because of the built in distributed search features, > solr needs to be a solr client) > > I'm not sure if there's any reason for solr-core to declare a maven > dependency on solr-solrj. When creating the POMs, I had (incorrectly) assumed that the core jar does not contain SolrJ classes, hence the dependency. -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
