Hi David, Thanks for the response! I use Unified Highlighter combined with maxAnalyzedChars to accomplish my needs.
I'll file an issue and PR for it! Kind Regards, Furkan KAMACI On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 11:25 PM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote: > Feel free to file an issue; I know it's not supported. I also don't think > it's a big deal because you can just ask Solr to return the > "alternateField", thus letting the client side choose when to use that. I > suppose it might be large, so I can imagine a concern there. It'd be nice > if Solr had a DocTransformer to accomplish that. > > I know it's been awhile; I'm curious how the UH has been working for you, > assuming you are using it. > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 6:47 AM Furkan KAMACI <furkankam...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > I want to switch to Unified Highlighter due to performance reasons for my > > Solr 7.6 I was using these fields > > > > solrQuery.addHighlightField("content_*") > > .set("f.content_en.hl.alternateField", "content") > > .set("f.content_es.hl.alternateField", "content") > > .set("hl.useFastVectorHighlighter", "true"); > > .set("hl.maxAlternateFieldLength", 300); > > > > As far as I see, there is no definitions for alternate fields for unified > > highlighter. How can I configure such a configuration? > > > > Kind Regards, > > Furkan KAMACI > > >
