I had a similar issue with a large number of facets. There is no way (At least I know) your can get an acceptable response time from search engine with high number of facets. The way we solved the issue was to cache shallow Facets data structure in the web services. Facts structures are refreshed periodically. We don't have near real time indexation requirements. Page response time is under 5s.
Here the URLs for our worst use case: https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/cfr https://www.govinfo.gov/app/cfrparts/month I hope that helps. Lotfi Mehai https://www.linkedin.com/in/lmehai/ On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 9:05 PM Rajdeep Sahoo <rajdeepsahoo2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Initially we were getting the warning message as ulimit is low i.e. 1024 > so we changed it to 65000 > Using ulimit -u 65000. > > Then the error was failed to reserve shared memory error =1 > Because of this we removed > -xx : +uselargepages > > Now in console log it is showing > Could not find or load main class \ > > And solr is not starting up > > > > On Mon, 20 Jan, 2020, 7:20 AM Walter Underwood, <wun...@wunderwood.org> > wrote: > > > What message do you get that means the heap space is full? > > > > Java will always use all of the heap, either as live data or > > not-yet-collected garbage. > > > > wunder > > Walter Underwood > > wun...@wunderwood.org > > http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > > > > > On Jan 19, 2020, at 5:47 PM, Rajdeep Sahoo <rajdeepsahoo2...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > Currently there is no request or indexing is happening. > > > It's just start up > > > And during that time heap is getting full. > > > Index size is approx 1 g. > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 20 Jan, 2020, 7:01 AM Walter Underwood, <wun...@wunderwood.org > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> A new garbage collector won’t fix it, but it might help a bit. > > >> > > >> Requesting 200 facet fields and having 50-60 of them with results is a > > >> huge amount of work for Solr. A typical faceting implementation might > > have > > >> three to five facets. Your requests will be at least 10X to 20X > slower. > > >> > > >> Check the CPU during one request. It should use nearly 100% of a > single > > >> CPU. If it a lot lower than 100%, you have another bottleneck. That > > might > > >> be insufficient heap or accessing disk during query requests (not > enough > > >> RAM). If it is near 100%, the only thing you can do is get a faster > CPU. > > >> > > >> One other question, how frequently is the index updated? > > >> > > >> wunder > > >> Walter Underwood > > >> wun...@wunderwood.org > > >> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > > >> > > >>> On Jan 19, 2020, at 4:49 PM, Rajdeep Sahoo < > rajdeepsahoo2...@gmail.com > > > > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Hi, > > >>> Still facing the same issue... > > >>> Anything else that we need to check. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Mon, 20 Jan, 2020, 4:07 AM Walter Underwood, < > wun...@wunderwood.org > > > > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> With Java 1.8, I would use the G1 garbage collector. We’ve been > > running > > >>>> that combination in prod for three years with no problems. > > >>>> > > >>>> SOLR_HEAP=8g > > >>>> # Use G1 GC -- wunder 2017-01-23 > > >>>> # Settings from https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ShawnHeisey > > >>>> GC_TUNE=" \ > > >>>> -XX:+UseG1GC \ > > >>>> -XX:+ParallelRefProcEnabled \ > > >>>> -XX:G1HeapRegionSize=8m \ > > >>>> -XX:MaxGCPauseMillis=200 \ > > >>>> -XX:+UseLargePages \ > > >>>> -XX:+AggressiveOpts \ > > >>>> “ > > >>>> > > >>>> wunder > > >>>> Walter Underwood > > >>>> wun...@wunderwood.org > > >>>> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > > >>>> > > >>>>> On Jan 19, 2020, at 9:25 AM, Rajdeep Sahoo < > > rajdeepsahoo2...@gmail.com > > >>> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> We are using solr 7.7 . Ram size is 24 gb and allocated space is 12 > > gb. > > >>>> We > > >>>>> have completed indexing after starting the server suddenly heap > space > > >> is > > >>>>> getting full. > > >>>>> Added gc params , still not working and jdk version is 1.8 . > > >>>>> Please find the below gc params > > >>>>> -XX:NewRatio=2 > > >>>>> -XX:SurvivorRatio=3 > > >>>>> -XX:TargetSurvivorRatio=90 \ > > >>>>> -XX:MaxTenuringThreshold=8 \ > > >>>>> -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC \ > > >>>>> -XX:+CMSScavengeBeforeRemark \ > > >>>>> -XX:ConcGCThreads=4 -XX:ParallelGCThreads=4 \ > > >>>>> -XX:PretenureSizeThreshold=512m \ > > >>>>> -XX:CMSFullGCsBeforeCompaction=1 \ > > >>>>> -XX:+UseCMSInitiatingOccupancyOnly \ > > >>>>> -XX:CMSInitiatingOccupancyFraction=70 \ > > >>>>> -XX:CMSMaxAbortablePrecleanTime=6000 \ > > >>>>> -XX:+CMSParallelRemarkEnabled > > >>>>> -XX:+ParallelRefProcEnabled > > >>>>> -XX:+UseLargePages \ > > >>>>> -XX:+AggressiveOpts \ > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
