> If you are redoing the indexing after changing the schema and > reloading/restarting, then you can ignore me.
I am sorry to say that I have to ignore you. Indeed, my tests include recreating the collection from scratch - with and without the copy fields. In both cases the index size is the same ! (while the _text_ field is working correctly) On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 05:32:09PM -0700, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 12/24/2019 5:11 PM, Nicolas Paris wrote: > > Do you mean "copy fields" is only an action of changing the schema ? > > I was thinking it was adding a new field and eventually a new index to > > the collection > > The copy that copyField does happens at index time. Reindexing is required > after changing the schema, or nothing happens. > > If you are redoing the indexing after changing the schema and > reloading/restarting, then you can ignore me. > > Thanks, > Shawn > -- nicolas
