>
> What should I use for numeric search.

numeric search or numeric sorting?

 I tried with pint also, but the result was the same.

It should have worked. please make sure data is reindexed after fieldType
changes

Regards,
Munendra S N



On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 4:10 PM Anuj Bhargava <anujb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I tried with pint also, but the result was the same. What should I use for
> numeric search.
>
> Regards,
>
> Anuj
>
> On Fri, 6 Dec 2019 at 15:55, Munendra S N <sn.munendr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Anuj,
> > As the field type is String, lexicographical sorting is done, not numeric
> > sorting.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Munendra S N
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 3:12 PM Anuj Bhargava <anujb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > When I sort desc on posting_id sort=posting_id%20desc, I get the
> > following
> > > result
> > > "posting_id":"9999313"
> > > "posting_id":"9999312"
> > > "posting_id":"9999310"
> > >
> > > When I sort asc on posting_id sort=posting_id%20asc, I get the
> following
> > > result
> > > "posting_id":"10005343"
> > > "posting_id":"10005349"
> > > "posting_id":"10005359"
> > >
> > > *In descending the 8 figure numbers are not coming up first and in
> > > ascending the 7 figure numbers are not coming up first.*
> > >
> > > Entry in schema is -
> > > <field name="posting_id" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true"
> > > required="true" docValues="true" multiValued="false"/>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to