> > What should I use for numeric search. numeric search or numeric sorting?
I tried with pint also, but the result was the same. It should have worked. please make sure data is reindexed after fieldType changes Regards, Munendra S N On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 4:10 PM Anuj Bhargava <anujb...@gmail.com> wrote: > I tried with pint also, but the result was the same. What should I use for > numeric search. > > Regards, > > Anuj > > On Fri, 6 Dec 2019 at 15:55, Munendra S N <sn.munendr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Anuj, > > As the field type is String, lexicographical sorting is done, not numeric > > sorting. > > > > Regards, > > Munendra S N > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 3:12 PM Anuj Bhargava <anujb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > When I sort desc on posting_id sort=posting_id%20desc, I get the > > following > > > result > > > "posting_id":"9999313" > > > "posting_id":"9999312" > > > "posting_id":"9999310" > > > > > > When I sort asc on posting_id sort=posting_id%20asc, I get the > following > > > result > > > "posting_id":"10005343" > > > "posting_id":"10005349" > > > "posting_id":"10005359" > > > > > > *In descending the 8 figure numbers are not coming up first and in > > > ascending the 7 figure numbers are not coming up first.* > > > > > > Entry in schema is - > > > <field name="posting_id" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true" > > > required="true" docValues="true" multiValued="false"/> > > > > > >