Maybe can you do it as part of the loading to calculate the score?
Which Solr version are you using?
Are you doing some heavily lifting into the constructor or your filter?
> Am 27.11.2019 um 09:34 schrieb Sripra deep <sriprad...@madstreetden.com>:
>
>
> Hi Jörn Franke,
>
> I modified the custom function to just return a constant value as 1.0 for
> all the docs and ran the load again, the latency is worst like more than
> 20sec. The filter I am using will fetch 15k documents (so this function is
> called 15k times). And if I don't call this function in my query then latency
> is less than 10ms.
>
> So it looks like some fundamental issue with this approach and I believe its
> been used in many business scenarios. Looking out for what's going wrong.
>
> Thanks,
> Sripradeep P
>
>
>> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 1:00 PM Jörn Franke <jornfra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> And have you tried how fast it is if you don’t do anything in this method?
>>
>> > Am 27.11.2019 um 07:52 schrieb Sripra deep <sriprad...@madstreetden.com>:
>> >
>> > Hi Team,
>> > I wrote a custom sort function that will read the field value and parse
>> > and returns a float value that will be used for sorting. this field is
>> > indexed, stored and docvalues enabled. my latency increases drastically
>> > from 10ms when the filter loads 50 documents and 200ms when it loads 250
>> > documents and 1sec when it loads 1000 documents.
>> >
>> > This is my function:
>> >
>> > @Override
>> > public FunctionValues getValues(Map context, LeafReaderContext reader)
>> > throws IOException {
>> > final FunctionValues vals = source.getValues(context, reader);
>> > return new FunctionValues() {
>> > public float floatVal(int doc) {
>> > float toRet = isasc ? Float.MAX_VALUE : Float.MIN_VALUE;
>> > /*
>> > My custom logic in reading a string array and returning a value out
>> > of some condition checks
>> > */
>> > }
>> > }
>> > }
>> >
>> > Can you suggest me some suggestions on this ?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Sripradeep P
