So are these really text locations or rather actually sections of the
document. If later, can you parse out sections during indexing?
Regards,
Alex
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019, 3:57 AM Kaminski, Adi, <adi.kamin...@verint.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks for the responses.
>
> It's a soft boundary which is resulted by dynamic syntax from our
> application. So may vary from different user searches, one user can search
> some "word1" in starting 30 words, and another can search "word2" in
> starting 10 words. The use case is to match some terms/phrase in specific
> document places in order to identify scripts/specific word ocuurences.
>
> So I guess copy field won't work here.
>
> Any other suggestions/thoughts ?
> Maybe some hidden position filters in native level to limit from start/end
> of the document ?
>
> Thanks,
> Adi
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Casey <tca...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 11:05 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Position search
>
> If this is about a normalized query, I would put the normalization text
> into a specific field. The reason for this is you may want to search the
> overall text during any form of expansion phase of searching for data.
> That is, maybe you want to know the context of up to the 120th word. At
> least you have both.
> Also, you may want to note which normalized fields were truncated or were
> simply too small. This would give some guidance as to the bias of the
> normalization. If 95% of the fields were not truncated, there is a chance
> you are not doing good at normalizing because you have a set of
> particularly short messages. So I would expect a small set of side fields
> remarking this. This would allow you to carry the measures along with the
> data.
>
> tim
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:19 PM Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Is the 100 words a hard boundary or a soft one?
> >
> > If it is a hard one (always 100 words), the easiest is probably copy
> > field and in the (unstored) copy, trim off whatever you don't want to
> > search. Possibly using regular expressions. Of course, "what's a word"
> > is an important question here.
> >
> > Similarly, you could do that with Update Request Processors and
> > clone/process field even before it hits the schema. Then you could
> > store the extract for highlighting purposes.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alex.
> >
> > On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 at 02:25, Kaminski, Adi <adi.kamin...@verint.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > What's the recommended way to search in Solr (assuming 8.2 is used)
> > > for
> > specific terms/phrases/expressions while limiting the search from
> > position perspective.
> > > For example to search only in the first/last 100 words of the document
> ?
> > >
> > > Is there any built-in functionality for that ?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > > Adi
> > >
> > >
> > > This electronic message may contain proprietary and confidential
> > information of Verint Systems Inc., its affiliates and/or
> > subsidiaries. The information is intended to be for the use of the
> > individual(s) or
> > entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or
> > authorized to receive this e-mail for the intended recipient), you may
> > not use, copy, disclose or distribute to anyone this message or any
> > information contained in this message. If you have received this
> > electronic message in error, please notify us by replying to this e-mail.
> >
>
>
> This electronic message may contain proprietary and confidential
> information of Verint Systems Inc., its affiliates and/or subsidiaries. The
> information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or
> entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or
> authorized to receive this e-mail for the intended recipient), you may not
> use, copy, disclose or distribute to anyone this message or any information
> contained in this message. If you have received this electronic message in
> error, please notify us by replying to this e-mail.
>
