Thanks for your hint. The documentation does not say if the result of filter is cached here (like fq=...) (I could test this).
Is *:* more expensive (query time) than filter() (*:* not required in StandardQueryParser) ? Kind regrads, Jochen ________________________________________ Von: Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> Gesendet: Samstag, 28. September 2019 22:58 An: solr-user Betreff: Re: filter in JSON Query DSL Giving https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_0/other-parsers.html#boolean-query-parser something like '{"query": { "bool": { "must": ["*:*"] , "filter": [ "meta_subject_txt:globe" ] } } }' I'm not sure why to put filter under must they should be siblings. On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 4:34 PM Jochen Barth <ba...@ub.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote: > Dear reader, > > this query works as expected: > > curl -XGET http://localhost:8982/solr/Suchindex/query -d ' > {"query": { "bool": { "must": "*:*" } }, > "filter": [ "meta_subject_txt:globe" ] }' > > this does not (nor without the curley braces around "filter"): > > curl -XGET http://localhost:8982/solr/Suchindex/query -d ' > {"query": { "bool": { "must": [ "*:*", { "filter": [ > "meta_subject_txt:globe" ] } ] } } }' > > Is "filter" within deeper queries possible? > > I've got some complex queries with a "kernel" somewhat below the top > level... > > Is "canonical" json important to match query cache entry? > > Would it help to serialize this queries to standard syntax and then use > filter(...)? > > Kind regards, > > Jochen > > > > -- > Jochen Barth * Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg, IT * Telefon 06221 > 54-2580 > > -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev
